Read attachment and write comments based on following requirements.

Summary. Your first paragraph should summarize, without evaluating, the draftyou are reviewing. You want to ensure, both to yourself and to the author, thatyou understand the draft completely. This helps the author trust your judgmentlater, and it may also point to something important the author may have missed.Don’t evaluate as this stage for the same reason: you need to make sure you graspthe argument before you can evaluate its strength.Major Points. The bulk of your review should consist of a critique of the majoraspects of the paper, such as its use of evidence, the strength of its claim, its tone,its style, its clarity, its brevity, and so forth. This is where you evaluate. Your goalis to help the author revise the paper so as to produce as strong a final product aspossible. Therefore, constructive critique is often more valuable than praise, butof course pointing out specific places that are working well is helpful (so long asyou can explain why, which is the helpful part).Minor Points. This is the place where you mention grammar, punctuation,spelling, documentation, formatting, and so forth. You should restrict your minorpoints to a separate section so that they do not overtake the major points section,which is the most important. In paper with a lot of minor issues, don’t go overevery little error. Instead, identify patterns and suggest making an appointment atthe Writing Center