I. Summarize the facts of the case- United States v. Alan Robert Johnson & Jennifer Sparks.

II In their appeal, Johnson & Sparks filed a motion to suppress. What were the allegations noted in their request to suppress the evidence.

III. Do you have a “reasonable expectation of privacy” in the text messages you send from your cell phone? In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court in Riley v California and United States v. Wurie, ruled that police could not make a warrantless search of a citizen's person’s cell phone without a search warrant. What is your opinion on this ruling and how do you think it will affect peace officers' ability to quickly solve crime?

Please answer the questions above I attached the case below

I also need two replies to students

Instructions

You must post at a minimum of 350-500 words for your initial response. Begin your response with a high level overview of the case. Respond to the questions above as if the reader has no knowledge of the facts of the case.

Expressing an opinion is not enough. You will be evaluated on the consistency and quality of your posts to the weekly discussion board. I will primarily be looking for how well you support your comments. I expect you to work to make meaning of the material of the course. I look for depth of engagement, as well as level of critical thinking and inquiry. Success hinges on keeping up with readings, and referring to them as much as possible when you do respond.