Chat with us, powered by LiveChat Critique of Research Studies – Part 3 | WriteDemy

Question Description

MUST FOLLOW ALL INSTRUCTIONS BELOW, AND MUST INCLUDE ALL ELEMENTS IN RUBRIC (please check below)

TEXT BOOK IS ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE

APA 6.0 REQUIRED AND INTENT CITATION REQUIRED,REFERENCE MUST BE LESS THAN 5 YEAR OLD

CONTINUATION Following question,

https://www.studypool.com/questions/885800

https://www.studypool.com/discuss/8615365/critique…

Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article critiques in Box 5.2: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research Report, and Box 5.3: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report, in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook.

  • Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
  • The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and Box 5.3 in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook.
  • Note that within these basic guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in additional boxes in other chapters of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.

When turning in the final submission, please put the elements in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (which should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).

Critique of Research Studies – Part 3: Due Topic 8

For Part 3 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:

Quantitative

Qualitative

  • Results
  • Results
    • Data analysis
    • Data analysis
    • Reliability and validity
    • Theoretical integrations
  • Discussion
  • Discussion
    • Interpretation of findings
    • Interpretation of the findings
    • Implications/Recommendations
    • Implications/Recommendations
  • Global Issues
  • Global Issues
    • Presentation
    • Presentation
    • Researcher credibility
    • Researcher credibility
    • Summary assessment
    • Summary assessment

    RUBRIC

Critique of Research Studies – Part 3

1
Not submitted
0.00%

2
Unsatisfactory
75.00%

3
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%

4
Satisfactory
88.00%

5
Good
92.00%

6
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

14.0 %Quantitative Results: Data analysis and findings.

None

Critique is missing for quantitative results.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

11.0 %Quantitative Discussion: Interpretation of the findings and implications/recommendations

None

Critique is missing for quantitative discussion.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

10.0 %Quantitative Global Issues: Presentation, researcher credibility, and summary assessment

None

Critique is missing for quantitative global issues.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

14.0 %Qualitative Results: Data analysis, findings, and theoretical integrations

None

Critique is missing for qualitative Results.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. . Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative results components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

11.0 %Qualitative Discussion: Interpretation of the findings and implications/recommendations

None

Critique is missing for qualitative Discussion.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

10.0 %Qualitative Global Issues: Presentation, researcher credibility, and summary assessment

None

Critique is missing for qualitative global issues.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing one component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative global issues components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative discussion components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

None

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)

None

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

None

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Ask A Question and we will direct you to our Order Page at WriteDemy. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Fill in all the assignment paper details that are required in the order form with the standard information being the page count, deadline, academic level and type of paper. It is advisable to have this information at hand so that you can quickly fill in the necessary information needed in the form for the essay writer to be immediately assigned to your writing project. Make payment for the custom essay order to enable us to assign a suitable writer to your order. Payments are made through Paypal on a secured billing page. Finally, sit back and relax.

Do you need an answer to this or any other questions?

About Writedemy

We are a professional paper writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework. We offer HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE Papers.

How It Works

To make an Order you only need to click on “Place Order” and we will direct you to our Order Page. Fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.

Are there Discounts?

All new clients are eligible for 20% off in their first Order. Our payment method is safe and secure.

Hire a tutor today CLICK HERE to make your first order