Question #1)

Completely rewrite your annotated bibliography ( DO NOT JUST EDIT). You must completely rewrite in order to receive full credit. You must also provide a paragraph of reflection explaining why and how you redrafted this section of your annotated bibliography.
In summary, your writing exercise should clearly label and including at least a paragraph reflection explaining why and how you redrafted your annotated bibliography.

My annotated bibliography is lacking a variety of academic sources, so please add 2 useful academic sources. In addition, make sure to analyse the credibility and usefulness of each source.

Moreover, the MLA format in my annotated bibliography is correct, so follow it for the new sources.

*My annotated bibliography is attached (ab sp#1)

Question#2)

For the critical analysis/ evaluation (source evaluation)

You lay out some critical criteria that a source should typically follow in order to be considered credible, including clarity. However, it is unclear on some of the other major criteria that you are analyzing your source against. Consider focusing on three to four main criteria. Then, describe in detail how the source complies with each criteria you laid out. Try to provide specific examples or quotes within the source to exemplify this. In addition, consider revising your introduction to focus more on the content of your paper and its analysis. So please edit that.

Thanks.

*Source evaluation is attached (ap sp#2)

the research paper will be about the different types of internal combustion engines, and I want to focus on the revival of rotary engines.

Research topic: Is There a Distinctive Revival of a Sophisticated Internal Combustion Engine