1. Read the Celeritas case.2. Write a 4 – 6 page paper to address the following:a. Problem: Following the executive interviews, Reese identified four areas that were negativelyimpacting the Celeritas leadership team. Based on what you read about team dynamics and marketperformance, do all of these areas of concern appear to be of equal importance? Explain yourposition.b. Analysis: Examine the possible causes of the issue or problem, using the questions below to guideyou:i. In what ways do Dr. Philip Boyer’s leadership style and history with the company contribute tothe team’s dysfunction?JWI 510: Leadership in the 21st CenturyAcademic Submissions and Evaluation© Strayer University. All Rights Reserved. This document contains Strayer University confidential and proprietary information and may not be copied, furtherdistributed, or otherwise disclosed, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of Strayer University. This document is subject to changebased on the needs of the class.JWMI 510 – Assignment 2 (1184) Page 2 of 8ii. How did Carla Reese's leadership style at the offsite meeting contrast with Boyer’s leadershipstyle? Cite specific examples for each to support your position.iii. Dave Lloyd made his case for why sales had been suffering at Celeritas, but his aggressivestyle, even if he was correct, seemed to cause others to go on the attack. How might he havepresented his position differently and, perhaps, have gotten a more supportive response?iv. How could Boyer have handled the follow-up meeting with the VPs differently? What stepsmight have reduced the negative reactions and created more enthusiasm for the announcedchanges?3. If sales were up but the senior team still lost confidence in Lloyd at the end of the third quarter, wouldBoyer still have been justified in asking for Lloyd’s resignation? Why?