No Plagiarism. I need a 5 page paper written on the outline I have provided. I have chosen the 2 case briefs for you to use. Other case laws will need to be used to explain why these 2 cases were decided the way they were. Those are provided for you in the cases I have chosen, so not much research there. I have also provided the scoring guide for you, please hit the distinguished mark on all categories.

Criminal Procedure in Motion

Competencies Addressed in This Assignment

• Competency 3: Explain the substantive and procedural interpretation of individual freedoms based on case analysis.
• Competency 4: Document philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences associated with U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
• Competency 5: Communicate effectively in writing.

Legal research serves as a gateway to locate cases that interpret key areas of substantive and procedural criminal law. From there, understanding how to read the case is integral to using the case for guidance on parameters. The issue is the question presented to the court for review. That question is based on whether what took place at the trial can be challenged as incorrect and impacting the outcome of the case. The appellate court, in reaching the decision, includes the law relied on as support for the decision. That includes statutory law, from legislatures, and other court rulings, where prior courts interpreted the law.

Using Lexis, searching in the U.S. Supreme Court directory, locate one case involving a criminal procedure issue. Searching law in your state, locate one case involving any criminal law issue. (I did this for you)

In a 4–5 page paper:

• Identify the key facts from each case and the issues presented to the courts.
• Describe the laws relied on by the courts in reaching the decisions.
• Illustrate the connection between that authority and the way the courts ruled.
• Explain the interpretations of constitutional protections based on the decisions.
• Describe philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences.
• Relate the importance of conducting this case analysis to a criminal justice career.

Be sure to review the Criminal Procedure in Motion Scoring Guide to ensure that you understand the criteria for this assignment.

Requirements

• Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• Resources and citations: Format according to APA guideline.
• Required page count: 4–5, not including the title page or the references page.
• Required number of references: A minimum of three.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

Criminal Procedure in Motion Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 3.
Percentage of Course Grade: 12%.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.

Criteria	Non-performance	Basic	Proficient	Distinguished
Identify key facts in the chosen cases. 15%	Does not Identify key facts from the chosen cases.	Identifies facts in the chosen cases that are not necessarily key facts.	Identifies key facts from the chosen cases.	Analyzes key facts from the chosen cases.
Identify key issues in the chosen cases. 15%	Does not identify key issues from the chosen cases.	Identifies issues in the chosen cases that are not necessarily key issues.	Identifies key issues from the chosen cases.	Analyzes key issues from the chosen cases.
Illustrate how law relied on by the courts was used to reach a decision in each case. 15%	Does not illustrate how law relied on by the courts was used to reach a decision in each case.	Partially addresses how law relied on by the courts was used to reach a decision in each case.	Illustrates how law relied on by the courts was used to reach a decision in each case.	Analyzes how law relied on by the courts was used to reach a decision in each case.
Explain the interpretations of constitutional protections based on case decisions. 15%	Does not explain the interpretations of constitutional protections based on case decisions.	Partially explains the interpretations of constitutional protections based on case decisions.	Explains the interpretations of constitutional protections based on case decisions.	Analyzes the interpretations of constitutional protections based on case decisions.
Describe philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences. 15%	Does not describe philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences.	Partially describes philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences.	Describes philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences.	Describes philosophical underpinnings and public policy influences and ties the descriptions to an insightful analysis of the relationship between the influences to the chosen cases.
Relate the importance of conducting case analysis to a criminal justice career. 15%	Does not relate the importance of conducting case analysis to a criminal justice career.	Partially relates the importance of conducting case analysis to a criminal justice career.	Relates the importance of conducting case analysis to a criminal justice career.	Analyzes the importance of conducting case analysis to a criminal justice career, illustrating with detailed reasoning.
Communicate effectively in writing. 10%	Does not communicate effectively in writing.	Communicates in writing in a manner that is not fully articulate in form, format, or content.	Communicates effectively in writing.	Communicates effectively in writing in form, format, and content throughout the entire submission.

4-5 page paper Outline

Jauch v Chocktaw County (2017)

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-cou…

·Identify the key factsfrom each case and the issues presented to the courts.

·Describe the lawsrelied on by the courts in reaching the decisions.

·Illustrate theconnection between that authority and the way the courts ruled.

·Explain theinterpretations of constitutional protections based on the decisions.

·Describe philosophicalunderpinnings and public policy influences.

·Relate the importanceof conducting this case analysis to a criminal justice career.

Ronald Dwight Tipton vMontana 13^th Judicial District Court (July 5, 2018)

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/mt-supreme-court/18988…

·Identify the key factsfrom each case and the issues presented to the courts.

·Describe the lawsrelied on by the courts in reaching the decisions.

·Illustrate theconnection between that authority and the way the courts ruled.

·Explain theinterpretations of constitutional protections based on the decisions.

·Describe philosophicalunderpinnings and public policy influences.

·Relate the importanceof conducting this case analysis to a criminal justice career.