Absolutely no plagiarism, must be original and very thorough. Please make sure everything is followed in the question and the grading rubric. Assigned reading articles are attached but also must include three other academic relevant resource, total of 4 (See below). Must include intext citations.

Reading:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielfisher/2013/07/16/delaware-public-benefit-corporation-lets-directors-serve-three-masters-instead-of-one/#7bf77ebda278

http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/a-global-view-of-corporate-governance-one-size-doesnt-fit-all/

Analysis of the Governance Structure for an International Corporation

This week you will work with your group that was assigned to you in week 1.

Together, choose a country with a different governance model from the United States and provide a detailed analysis of its governance structure. Compare and contrast that governance model with the model used in the United States. What do you see as the pros and cons of each type of governance model? Create a hybrid model that might lead to more effective governance.

Create a presentation to showcase your analysis work:

1. Select a media format for your presentation. Consider using the following as a creative way to display your work:

• Prezi (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

• emaze (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

• Google Presentations (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

• Haiku Deck (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

• Projeqt (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

• PowerPoint

• Any other equivalent media tool

2. The length of your presentation should be 15-20 slides and contain key elements such as a cover slide, table of contents, appropriate headings, and reference page.

3. Information should be well organized and follow a logical fashion.

4. Minimum of 3 references to valid (recent, relevant, high-quality) external sources of information and properly cited within the text and cited in APA format within the reference page. Should alsoContain 1 reference from the course.

Week 3 Group Assignment

Week 3 Group Assignment
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Participation on the Group Discussion Board	30.0 pts There is extremely thoughtful, substantive and respectful participation on the discussion board. The student has made multiple posts on the discussion board in a timely fashion, with all of the posts contributing to and advancing the discussion in a very substantial way.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking	20.0 pts Assignment demonstrates excellent use of various critical thinking standards and concepts. These may include proper use of logic, reasoning, and the posing of well-considered questions.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content and Development	20.0 pts Content is very comprehensive and supported by detailed references to lectures and assigned readings. Thoroughly evaluates the impact, creativity, and value of the subject.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization and Length	10.0 pts Appropriate tool is used (submitted as a Word document); the organization is clear and easy to follow. The assignment follows the suggested word count.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sentence Structure, Grammar and Spelling	10.0 pts Sentences are structured correctly. There are no grammatical or spelling errors.
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Timely Submission	10.0 pts Assignment is submitted on a timely basis.