Required Uniform Assignment: National Patient Safety GoalsPURPOSEThis exercise is designed to increase the students' awareness of the National Patient Safety Goals developedby The Joint Commission. Specifically, this assignment will introduce the Speak Up Initiatives, an awardwinning patient safety program designed to help patients promote their own safety by proactively takingcharge of their healthcare.COURSE OUTCOMESThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.CO #2: Apply the concepts of health promotion and illness prevention in the laboratory setting. (PO #2)CO #8: Explain the rationale for selected nursing interventions based upon current nursing literature. (PO#8)DUE DATEWeek 6Campus: As directed by your faculty memberOnline: As directed by your faculty memberPOINTS50 pointsREQUIREMENTS1. Select a Speak Up brochure developed by The Joint Commission. Follow this link to the properwebsite: https://www.jointcommission.org/topics/speak_up_ca…2. Write a short paper reviewing the brochure. Use the Grading Criteria (below) to structure your critique,and include current nursing or healthcare research to support your critique.a. The length of the paper is to be no greater than three pages, double spaced, excluding titlepage and reference page. Extra pages will not be read and will not count toward your grade.3. This assignment will be graded on quality of information presented, use of citations, and use ofStandard English grammar, sentence structure, and organization based on the required components.4. Create the review using Microsoft Word 2007 (a part of Microsoft Office 2007), the required format forall Chamberlain documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word 2007 documentbecause it will end in “.docx.”5. Any questions about this paper may be discussed in the weekly Q & A Forum in your online course ordirectly with your faculty member if you are taking NR224 on campus.6. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of thereview as Level 1 headers (upper- and lowercase, bold, centered).a. Introductionb. Summary of Brochurec. Evaluation of Brochured. ConclusionPREPARING THE PAPERThe following are the best practices in preparing this paper.Assignment Guidelines1) Read the brochure carefully and take notes. Highlighting important points has been helpful to manystudents.NR224 Safety Goals RUA.docx Revised 01/10/2018 WBS 1NR224 Fundamentals – Skills2) Title page: Include title of your paper, your name, Chamberlain College of Nursing, NR224Fundamentals—Skills, faculty name, and the date. Center all items between the left and rightmargins, beginning approximately 3 inches from the top margin.NOTE: This style of cover page is required by the college and is a variance of APA formatting.3) Use the CCN library or online library to find current nursing research that supports your findings.4) The brochure you select must be properly cited in the body of your paper and on the reference list.5) The brochure selected must be submitted with your workDIRECTIONS AND GRADING CRITERIACategory Points % DescriptionIntroduction 3 6 This first part of your paper should be one paragraph that includesthe brochure title, date published, and your understanding of whothe information would benefit.Summary of thebrochure'srecommendations10 20 Summary of brochure must include1. main topics discussed; and2. how communication between patients and healthcare providersis encouraged.Evaluation of thebrochure20 40 Critique the brochure. Include a full one- to two-page critique thatanswers all of the following questions.1. What was done well, and what could have been improved in thebrochure?2. Why did this topic interest you?3. Was the information provided in the brochure beneficial? Couldyou incorporate it in your patient education?4. Was the information presented clearly?5. Did current nursing or healthcare related research support theinformation presented in the brochure?6. What population or individuals does this article apply to (i.e.,who will benefit the most from this brochure)? Who else can usethis information?7. Will this information increase patient safety? Defend youranswer.Conclusion 5 10 An effective conclusion identifies the main ideas and major supportpoints from the body of your report. Minor details are left out.Summarize the benefits of following the brochure's advice to aperson at risk.Clarity of writing 10 20 Use Standard English grammar and sentence structure. No spellingor typographical errors (typos) are present. The paper is organizedaround required components, using appropriate headers.AAssignment GuidelinesNR224: Fundamentals-SkillsGRADING RUBRICAssignment Criteria Outstanding or Highest Level ofPerformanceA (92–100%)Very Good or High Level ofPerformanceB (84–91%)Competent or SatisfactoryLevel of Performance C(76–83%)Poor, Failing or UnsatisfactoryLevel of Performance F(0–75%)Introduction3 pointsIntroduction provides a full and complete identification of the brochure, including the brochure title, date published, andunderstanding of who the information would benefit.3 pointsPartial identification of requiredelements OR introduction contains norequired elements OR no introduction0–2 pointsSummary of thearticle10 pointsSummary is complete and thoroughlycovers all required elements.10 pointsSummary is complete and is missingno more than one required element.9 pointsSummary is complete and is missingno more than two required elements.8 pointsSummary is incomplete or notincluded and is missing more thanone required element.0–7 pointsEvaluation of theArticle20 pointsCritique of article demonstratescritical thinking and answers allrequired questions and supportedfindings with current nursing research.19–20 pointsCritique demonstrates basicunderstanding of article, answers allbut one of the required questions,and/or does not support findings withcurrent research.17–18 pointsCritique demonstrates basicunderstanding of article, answers allbut two or three of the requiredquestions, and/or does not supportfindings with current research.16 pointsThe critique of the article is poor,lacks critical or original thinking, andfails to answer two or more questions0–15 pointsConclusion5 pointsOriginal explanation is well evidencedand developed.5 pointsOriginal explanation is present andwell evidenced, yet not welldeveloped.4.5 pointsOriginal explanation is present,though not well evidenced ordeveloped.4 pointsConclusion is omitted OR no originalexplanation is present in conclusion.0–3 pointsClarity of writing10 pointsPaper has excellent use of StandardEnglish, showing original thought,has no spelling or grammar errors,and is well organized.10 pointsPaper has some evidence of ownexpression and competently useslanguage, no more than two spellingor grammar errors, and is wellorganized.9 pointsPaper has some evidence of ownexpression and competently useslanguage, no more than four spellingor grammar errors, and is wellorganized.8 pointsLanguage needs development. Thereare five or more spelling and/orgrammar errors, and paper is poorlyorganized.0–7 pointsNR224 Safety Goals RUA.docx Revised 01/10/2018 WBS 3Assignment GuidelinesAPA format2 pointsPaper correctly follows APA format with no more than two types of errors.2 pointsPaper has three to five errors in APAformat, grammar, spelling, and syntaxand/or one–two citations are missing.1 pointAPA, grammar, spelling and/orpunctuation contain multiple errorsand/or many citations are missing