Identifying Stakeholders Case Study Rubrics

5

Exceeds Expectations

3-4

Meets Expectations

0-2

Below Expectations

Quality of Information

Information clearly related to the main topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples.

Information clearly related to the main topic. It provides 1-2 supporting details and/or examples.

Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. No details and/or examples are given.

Mechanics

0-1 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

2-4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

5 or more grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

Considers and identifies stakeholders

Identifies and prioritizes the impacts on all relevant stakeholders, their various perspectives; and identifies who should be involved in the decision-making.

Accurately identifies some key stakeholders, but demonstrates no, or insufficient, awareness of whether, or how, they should, or can, be involved in the decision-making.

Fails to identify relevant stakeholders and who should be involved in the decision-making.

Chooses a course of action

Formulates a decision; articulates a plan for implementing that decision; and evidences an understanding of the ecological, social, and economic implications of that decision.

Formulates a decision that articulates a plan for implementing it, but does not demonstrate an understanding of the ecological, social and economic consequences of that decision.

Does not identify and/or explain any appropriate decision or a course of action from among alternatives available.

Analysis

Uses inductive or deductive reasoning to make inferences regarding premises; addresses implications and consequences.

Uses logical reasoning to make inferences regarding premises; addresses implications and consequences.

Uses superficial reasoning or unreasonable inferences regarding solutions.