100.0 %Criteria

20.0 %Formal Summative Assessment

Not addressed.

The formal summative assessment included does not align with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, or learning objective.

The formal summative assessment included may not completely align with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, or learning objective.

A formal summative assessment aligns with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, and learning objective.

A formal summative assessment clearly and directly aligns with the informational text, learning activity, reading standard, and learning objective.

10.0 %Instructions and Answer Key or Rubric

Not addressed.

The instructions or answer key or rubric are presented incompletely or incorrectly.

The instructions or answer key or rubric could be developed more fully.

Clear instructions are included along with an answer key or rubric.

Clear and concise instructions are included along with a complete answer key or rubric.

15.0 %Rationale – What is Measured

Not addressed.

The description of the knowledge and skills to be measured is not presented thoroughly.

The description of the knowledge and skills to be measured could be presented more thoroughly.

A description of the knowledge and skills to be measured is included.

A complete description of all of the knowledge and skills to be measured is included.

10.0 %Rationale – Effectiveness

Not addressed.

The statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment is not presented accurately.

The statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment could be presented more accurately.

A statement regarding the effectiveness of the assessment is included.

An accurate description of the effectiveness of the assessment is included.

10.0 %Rationale – Why this Type was Chosen

Not addressed.

The statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is not fully developed.

The statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen could be more fully developed.

A statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is included.

An insightful and well-thought out statement regarding why this type of assessment was chosen is included.

15.0 %Rationale – Appropriateness

Not addressed.

The statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is not presented well.

The statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile requires further development.

A statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is included.

An accurate statement regarding how this assessment is appropriate for the intended grade level of students in the profile is included.

10.0 %Organization

Not addressed.

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

The content could be organized better even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea.

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

10.0 %Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present but are not overly distracting to the reader; or inconsistent language or word choice is present; or sentence structure could be more varied.

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

100 %Total Weightage